Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456
Results 76 to 86 of 86
  1. #76
    Astonishing Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    3,224

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JKtheMac View Post
    Don't you think it is a little simplistic to make Woden or Baal, Sky Gods. The categories are somewhat flawed if you do that. For example, just because Lucifer has a 'star' doesn't make him a sky god but is he really and underworld god either?
    Lucifer is underworld "god" because Lucifer reigns in Hell.

    Why would Woden and Baal not be sky gods? Its not really a judgement on good or bad although I suppose any god could be underworld or sky pretty much.

  2. #77
    Incredible Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    960

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JKtheMac View Post
    Don't you think it is a little simplistic to make Woden or Baal, Sky Gods. The categories are somewhat flawed if you do that. For example, just because Lucifer has a 'star' doesn't make him a sky god but is he really and underworld god either?
    I wasn't placing judgments, but merely categorizing as I read the text.

    Doesn't Woden have an outburst because he wasn't trusted with Sky God intel?

    I'm sure Sky-Underworld is a spectrum, with Amaterasu at one end and Morrigan at the other.

  3. #78
    Astonishing Member JKtheMac's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Bedford UK
    Posts
    4,537

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JediKage View Post
    Lucifer is underworld "god" because Lucifer reigns in Hell.

    Why would Woden and Baal not be sky gods? Its not really a judgement on good or bad although I suppose any god could be underworld or sky pretty much.
    Lucifer is not Satan. Different aspect. Lucifer is the light-bringer, the most beloved of god.

  4. #79
    Astonishing Member JKtheMac's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Bedford UK
    Posts
    4,537

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CRaymond View Post
    I wasn't placing judgments, but merely categorizing as I read the text.

    Doesn't Woden have an outburst because he wasn't trusted with Sky God intel?

    I'm sure Sky-Underworld is a spectrum, with Amaterasu at one end and Morrigan at the other.
    I don't trust such categories. They are reminiscent of comparative religious theory, which is a somewhat dated approach to mythology.

  5. #80
    Astonishing Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    3,224

    Default

    I don't see why you are overreacting to it...the actual comic doesn't imply that being Sky makes you good and being Underworld makes you bad.

    Dio is like the nicest. While Woden is the worst.

    Granted Sky Gods have a bonus job of actually fighting the Great Darkness but still.

    But mythological gods did tend to have domains.

  6. #81
    Incredible Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    960

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JKtheMac View Post
    I don't trust such categories. They are reminiscent of comparative religious theory, which is a somewhat dated approach to mythology.
    How so, and opposed to what? If you don't mind detailing what you mean.

  7. #82
    Astonishing Member JKtheMac's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Bedford UK
    Posts
    4,537

    Default

    To clarify, I am not reacting, just expressing a preference born out of my studies in the field of mythology. Also, I imagine Gillen has done some research regards theories of mythology, and I doubt he has deliberately chosen to use old fashioned methods. Judging by Cassandra's attitude (who seems to be the mouthpiece he uses to express theoretical ideas) that seems pretty unlikely. Therefore I doubt such categories will really inform a reading of this text.


    Cassie would over react. She would tell you to take that colonial thinking elsewhere. I am not her.
    Last edited by JKtheMac; 07-13-2017 at 07:54 AM.

  8. #83
    Incredible Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    960

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JKtheMac View Post
    To clarify, I am not reacting, just expressing a preference born out of my studies in the field of mythology. Also, I imagine Gillen has done some research regards theories of mythology, and I doubt he has deliberately chosen to use old fashioned methods. Judging by Cassandra's attitude (who seems to be the mouthpiece he uses to express theoretical ideas) that seems pretty unlikely. Therefore I doubt such categories will really inform a reading of this text.


    Cassie would over react. She would tell you to take that colonial thinking elsewhere. I am not her.
    Okay, but I'm genuinely interested. I was hoping you'd give me some kind of primer on how to understand your perspective.

    I realize some cultures and mythologies don't recognize underworlds or pantheons, but in the context of WicDiv, we're given both, and a seeming ultimate purpose(albeit from an unreliable sourse) for "sky gods" to "confront a great darkness".

  9. #84
    Astonishing Member JKtheMac's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Bedford UK
    Posts
    4,537

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CRaymond View Post
    Okay, but I'm genuinely interested. I was hoping you'd give me some kind of primer on how to understand your perspective.

    I realize some cultures and mythologies don't recognize underworlds or pantheons, but in the context of WicDiv, we're given both, and a seeming ultimate purpose(albeit from an unreliable sourse) for "sky gods" to "confront a great darkness".
    I am really not sure that is true. Some division was created, and used by Ananke for her own ends, and there is a hangover from those times now. But the Underworld as a concept means different things to different cultures, and I suspect Gillen is being looser and more playful. Certainly he used the Persephone story in a playful way.

    I see Baal as being used to emphasise masculinity and patriarchy, and Woden in his aspect as magician. Neither are acting particularly like the typical distant sky god, overseeing creation.

  10. #85
    Incredible Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    960

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JKtheMac View Post
    I am really not sure that is true. Some division was created, and used by Ananke for her own ends, and there is a hangover from those times now. But the Underworld as a concept means different things to different cultures, and I suspect Gillen is being looser and more playful. Certainly he used the Persephone story in a playful way.
    So you're calling the context of the story unreliable? That the Underworld, as a plane inaccessible to some god-characters, doesn't exist in the context of the story --but except as a suggestion by Ananke to divide the pantheon? I hope to god I'm misunderstanding you, because what I read was incredibly evasive and dismissive to my request for clarification.

    Quote Originally Posted by JKtheMac View Post
    I see Baal as being used to emphasise masculinity and patriarchy, and Woden in his aspect as magician. Neither are acting particularly like the typical distant sky god, overseeing creation.
    It seems obvious the "gods" are not one-to-one matches for the myths they are named for, and far more likely to be adjacent to archetypes, but this all began with a simple, shared categorization.

  11. #86
    Astonishing Member JKtheMac's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Bedford UK
    Posts
    4,537

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CRaymond View Post
    So you're calling the context of the story unreliable? That the Underworld, as a plane inaccessible to some god-characters, doesn't exist in the context of the story --but except as a suggestion by Ananke to divide the pantheon? I hope to god I'm misunderstanding you, because what I read was incredibly evasive and dismissive to my request for clarification.
    I find it quite amusing that you would demand anything in this context. Quite what you want me to clarify is beyond me.

    What are you seeing as a plane of existence? All I am seeing is an aspect of one or two characters that are able to pull people underground. I don't see any evidence of planes or strange realms. And I especially don't see any evidence of the opposite, some above realm where the supposed sky gods can go, and underworld deities can't enter. Just some characters that can fly and levitate, and some that can teleport.

    What we actually have are characters that have specific powers, nominally tied to certain deities that share some of those traits. These are superheroes with a theme.

    It seems obvious the "gods" are not one-to-one matches for the myths they are named for, and far more likely to be adjacent to archetypes, but this all began with a simple, shared categorization.
    I am simply suggesting that such categorisation, while an interesting exercise in and of itself, is probably not very useful as a predictive tool for how this story will progress.

    Even the word 'archetype' is up for examination by this kind of story. It is certainly a disputed term in mythological studies. Mostly confined to Jungian thought, which despite its popularity in modern culture, is looked at as somewhat old fashioned as an analytical tool.

    Of course Gillian may be working with this kind of model, but I am suggesting that if he is it may be in a challenging manner.
    Last edited by JKtheMac; 07-16-2017 at 06:48 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •